Having researched the Soviet 1930s extensively last year in college I was more surprised than I probably should have been. Historical reconciliation, dealing with the dark, dark past is far from complete in Russia. During the 1990s, the Russian government and society at large made significant strides towards reopening painful memories of revolution, civil war, and the catastrophic effects of 1930s Stalinist revolution; today most of those progressive movements have been reversed by a more conservative government which has been far less inclined to openly discuss these emotionally difficult historical topics. The 1930s were the formative years of Soviet society, culture, and government, so for a museum to be missing an entire twenty years of crucial solidifying Soviet history sends a message about how open this country is to dealing with reconciliation. For more on this topic, here's an NYT article I used last year: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/27/world/europe/27archives.html
History is everywhere here, not just in the museum, and most of it is untold (and certainly most Russians are unaware). Perhaps the best example I know of is Olkhon Island - see my first blog post from 6 weeks ago - beautiful Lake Baikal, surreal skies, magnificent cliffs, and unique wildlife. Like many places in this country which could normally be considered uninhabitable, the 1930s was an era of enormous upheaval as people were exiled not just to Baikal (they would have been comparatively lucky) but to the furthest geographical reaches of the Soviet Union, places which were actually uninhabitable. For the people exiled to Olkhon, the island was very much a prison, and strangely enough, today it is an ecological tourism paradise.
I asked some of my students about the missing 20+ years in the museum and their response was that some years ago there was a fire so maybe that explains it. Fire seems to explain a lot of things in Siberia, after all, almost all structures are made of wood.
No comments:
Post a Comment